The Chinatown International District Coalition wants to protect neighborhood residents–95 percent of whom are renters and 25 percent who live below the poverty line. (Photo: Cliff Cawthon)
The Chinatown-International District Coalition fights against 1,600 market-rate residences and hotel rooms flooding their neighborhood
By Cliff Cawthon, Contributing Writer
On November 19, the Chinatown-International District (CID) Coalition (also known as Humbows Not Hotels) hosted a community meeting about developer-driven displacement in their neighborhood. Forty community members came to the meeting, co-sponsored by former Seattle City Councilmember Kirsten Harris-Talley, to discuss their concerns.
The CID Coalition was founded a year ago after Cynthia Brothers, an activist and creator of the Vanishing Seattle website, wrote a piece in the Seattle Globalist about the rapid pace of development in the neighborhood and how it might lead to displacement. The Coalition includes residents of the neighborhood, people who are connected to the neighborhood and other concerned allies who have been keeping an eye on development.
The CID, the historic heart of Seattle’s Asian American and Pacific Islander (API) community, is home to 5,000 residents. While Seattle’s overall median income has shot up to $80,000, the CID’s average median income is only $40,000. Twenty-five percent of the neighborhood lives below the poverty line. According to the city, “95% of the area population are renters.”
No they’re not carolers but community leaders from across Seattle at City Hall and voicing their opposition to the HALA “developer giveaway” upzones
Coalition of groups from across Seattle demonstrate broadbased opposition to the City’s HALA Grand Bargain “developer giveaway”
On Monday, Nov. 27th, 26 neighborhood, housing and homeless advocacy, small business and environmental groups from every corner of Seattle held a press conference at City Hall to announce formation of a coalition to challenge the adequacy of the final environmental impact statement for the planned “HALA-MHA” upzones and mandatory housing requirement. (A video of the event is here)
Calling themselves “the Seattle Coalition for Affordability, Livability and Equity” or SCALE, the Coalition filed this appeal with the City Hearing Examiner. If successful the appeal would force a ‘remand’ sending the upzones back for further review, revisions, and public hearings. A successful challenge would be a significant setback for city leaders, like Councilmember Rob Johnson, and their efforts to ram these upzones through the Council next year.
The City Council cannot act on the HALA land use changes or mandatory housing requirement before a hearing examiner decision on the appeal and the environmental review process has played out. A remand would force at least a six month delay in the process if not longer.
Said David Ward, a Ravenna renter and president of the coalition, in reference to the HALA plan, “It will make Seattle far more unaffordable and also make it more difficult to live here due to more traffic, not enough schools, more pollution, fewer trees, and a loss of the diversity of residents we currently have.”
“Activist church” would displace ten residents receiving assistance from Community Psychiatric Clinic (CPC)
Church ignores law restricting demolition of housing for parking lot and city inspectors ask for ‘correction’; Coalition also says Church may have violated just cause and tenant relocation laws
Last week, The Seattle Times published a front-page story about University Unitarian Church’s plan to tear down 3 homes in Northeast Seattle rented to 10 formerly homeless people… for a parking lot. Community Psychiatric Clinic (CPC) has managed the homes for years behalf of the Church. The units are offered to people with mild mental health issues and also receive services from CPC.
The Times story does not make clear why church leaders could not include the parking ‘on-site’ incorporated directly into their renovation plan. (CORRECTION: An earlier version of this post incorrectly stated that the houses are on the opposite side of the street from the church. In fact, the three houses are on the same side.)
The church easily could incorporate parking into their renovation plans instead of demolishing these homes serving low income families
The story left us scratching our heads since we are aware of city legislation passed some 20 years ago barring demolition of existing structurally sound housing for a ‘principle use’ parking lots. (Recently the City Council watered down this legislation allowing developers to abandon rental homes and then later demolish them, but the prohibition on demolition for a parking lots remains.)
Mayor Tim Burgess is getting pushback from community groups about his housing policy.
Community groups express concerns about race, social justice and city hall’s ability to listen
By Cliff Cawthon, Contributing Writer
Last Thursday, Mayor Tim Burgess unveiled a plan to implement Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) requirements on all new multifamily and commercial development in 27 neighborhoods across Seattle. MHA would allow developers to build bigger and taller building in exchange for including affordable housing in their projects or contributing to a low-income housing fund. Under this plan, the mayor hopes that the city will meet its goal of at least 6,000 new rent-restricted homes for low-income people over the next decade.
The plan overall includes building 50,000 homes by 2025, including 20,000 affordable homes (6000 of these would be income restricted). The plan is purportedly aimed at expanding the housing capacity first in the city’s urban villages, in densely packed neighborhoods including Rainier Beach, Othello, and South Park, all places at high risk of displacement. In other words, places where residents are extremely vulnerable to any immediate economic shock.
This, of course, has received pushback from people in the community who are concerned that this approach would exacerbate displacement and not create enough housing to meet demand.
(Photo by Rebekah Demirel)
An excerpt from her new book: “Nothing’s for Nothing” (Rose Hip Press)
by Rebekah Demirel
As long as I can remember, planting, watering and weeding has been a solace for me. Pulling weeds feels cathartic and cleansing. You have to pull them by the roots, though, or they just come back stronger and choke out the tender baby plants.
Over time I’ve pulled a lot of personal weeds from my life. Bad habits, lies, people who choked out what I wanted to grow…I learned to dig deep to extract the noxious elements. I’ve found that I have to weed regularly, and then cultivation of something good can keep the weeds from coming back.
In the permaculture way of thinking, weeds are not called “invasive.” Plants that grow very quickly in places where they are not cultivated – often smothering food sources, using precious nutrients and water – are known as “opportunistic” plants. They find a place to insert themselves, often in disturbed soil, and then they are hard to get rid of. They keep reproducing.
Just like bad habits.
Durkan dominated all electioneering aspects of the mayoral race. (Photo: Durkan campaign)
Seattle’s establishment candidate Durkan wins mayor’s race
By George Howland Jr
On election night, former U.S. Attorney for Western Washington Jenny Durkan ran up a huge lead, 61-39 percent, over urbanist Cary Moon. While Moon refused to concede, the numbers are daunting (for more on the math, see below). Minutes after the first batch of votes were counted, The Seattle Times had declared Durkan the winner.
All in all, it was a very good evening for the Seattle political establishment.
The mayoral contest was never much of a horse race.
Durkan had a fantastic showing in August’s primary election, getting 29 percent of the vote in a 21-person race and besting Moon by 12 points.
Durkan was a candidate made for Seattle voters. Durkan has had a long and storied career as a lawyer in the state Democratic Party, working for former Gov. Mike Lowry and defending former Gov. Christine Gregoire’s razor-thin victory in court. Not only did Durkan serve former President Barak Obama as a U.S. Attorney, she was also the first openly LGBTQ U.S. Attorney in our nation’s history. Before Durkan became U.S. Attorney, she worked hard on police reform at a local level. Once she became U.S. Attorney, she dragged former Mayor Mike McGinn into a consent decree that mandated changes for the Seattle Police Department’s use of force and biased policing.